Dec 25, 2006 10:20 pm
Theology
A few days ago I picked up a Romanian Orthodox prayer book, which I’ve been paging through and working with ever since. Most of the prayers are familiar to me at least in translation, but in the section on confession I found a ranking of sins that was surprising and delightful.
When I saw the section entitled “The Gravest Sins”, I was expecting the familiar list of seven deadly sins that most people know, however vaguely, from the Roman Catholic church. However, this is not what I found. The sins are given three ranks: The Gravest Sins, Which Are Against the Holy Spirit, The Sins Which Cry Out To Heaven, and The Chief Sins (my own translations. There are probably customary English names for these ranks, but how could I resist a name like “The Sins Which Cry Out To Heaven” ?) The third rank, The Chief Sins is very similar to the seven deadly sins that we know: pride, love of wealth, fornication, greed, envy, anger, and sloth. The only thing that I find especially interesting here is that “love of wealth” is listed separately from “greed”, which could occasion a comment at another time. Likewise, there are five sins listed in The Sins Which Cry Out To Heaven: murder and abortion, the sins of Sodom and Gomorrah, withholding the workers’ pay, oppression of widows and orphans, and mockery and oppression of parents.
Let’s take a quick moment to marvel at these two lists. I find it remarkable how little space on the lists is taken up with culture-war preoccupations: only three items named here (abortion, sodomy, and fornication) hold any interest for the usual suspects on the Christian right, and they’re sharing space with greed, workers’ pay, and oppression of widows, which are usually hobbyhorses for the left. And then there’s the ones that no one pays any attention to: who cares about sloth anymore? Or mockery of parents? And where are things like theft and lying?
So it’s good to be reminded that the priorities of the Church, when properly ordered, do not necessarily match up with our current cultural and political points of contention.
But it’s the first set, the Sins Against the Holy Spirit that most intrigues me:
1. Unfaithfulness or indifference to God, who is magnified in the Trinity.
There’s a whole post somewhere to be written about indifference to God and how easy that is. And I like the fact that they specify the Trinity: it’s not the vague, monist “God” of Hallmark cards and politicians that we must be faithful to, but the God who is worshipped as Three in One.
2. Hatred for God.
Which isn’t a surprise.
3. Despondency before the great mercy of God and His care for us…
I did a double-take when I read this, and went back to make sure that I understood it. But, no, this is exactly what it says: lack of faith in God’s goodness, both to forgive sins and to care for His people, is a sin equal to hatred of God. The significance of this, and what it means for every bruised soul in Christendom can hardly be overstated.
… or too great a trust in the all-goodness of God, trust which makes you to commit sins without cease, reckoning that God will forgive you even if you do not correct yourself.
This is the continuation of number 3, and it expresses the opposite pole. This is the pit into which I have fallen: allowing myself to sin, knowing that God will eventually forgive me. Which He does (see above), but we must repent of the pride of leaning on His mercy.
It seems like there should be much more that I can and should say about this. My entire Christian life has been lived between the poles marked out by this third item. Doamne miluieşte…
Comments (No Comments)